注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

计算机科研与技术

QQ 11360330

 
 
 

日志

 
 

审稿人意见真多啊  

2013-11-14 17:52:16|  分类: 论文写作发表 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |

Comments to the Author
1 - The experimental needs a lot of work. How did you do fluorescence measurements? What electrolyte did you test in? Did you use NMP in your slurry? These are just example of what is missing. Please be MUCH more detail oriented in this section.
2 - How do Zn and O from fluorescence lead you to conclude that "the pyrolitic products is stoichiometric "?? That seems impossible based on there being O in the cathode material.
3 - Can you really use 5 significant figures in reported gravimetric capacities?
4 - Page 4, lines 31 - 36. I think that claim is too strong given the figure. Also, line 56 to page 5 line 2 - the sentence beginning "Especially..." I don't think you can make such a claim when you show just one cell having better capacity retention between 40-50 cycles. The fact that that cell had lower capacity during cycles 1-40 make it likely to have better retention at cycle 50.

1.试验量不够;
2.得出的结论不准确;
3.重量分析应至少使用5位有效数字;
4.分析部深刻,结论太牵强。

  评论这张
 
阅读(79)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017